Key Small Business Protections in Federal Contracting: Know Your Rights

← Back to Protect Your Business Overview

For over 70 years, the U.S. government has recognized the critical role of small businesses in the nation's economy and has established specific laws and regulations to ensure they have a fair opportunity to compete for federal contracts. Understanding these fundamental protections is the first step in defending your right to participate in the federal marketplace, especially in light of current actions seeking to undermine them.

The Small Business Act – The Foundation of Fair Access

The cornerstone of small business protection in federal contracting is the Small Business Act. First enacted in 1953, this landmark legislation declares it the official policy of the Congress that the Government should 'aid, counsel, assist, and protect... the interests of small-business concerns in order to preserve free competitive enterprise'. A core mandate of the Act is to ensure that small businesses are given the 'maximum practicable opportunity' to participate in the performance of government contracts. This isn't a suggestion; it's a foundational principle of American economic policy, consistently upheld through decades of bipartisan support.

The Rule of Two – Your Right to Compete for Set-Asides

One of the most crucial mechanisms for ensuring small business participation is the 'Rule of Two.' This rule generally requires that a federal procurement opportunity must be 'set aside' exclusively for small businesses if the contracting officer has a reasonable expectation that at least two responsible small businesses can submit offers at fair market prices.

• Statutory Mandate (Under the Simplified Acquisition Threshold - SAT): For contracts valued above the micro-purchase threshold and at or below the SAT (the Simplified Acquisition Threshold is $250,000, increasing to $350,000 effective June 11, 2025), the Rule of Two is a direct statutory requirement under 15 U.S.C. § 644(j). This means agencies are legally bound to set these contracts aside if the conditions are met.
• Historical Regulatory Application (Above SAT): For decades, the FAR also applied the Rule of Two to contracts above the SAT through regulatory provisions. However, as detailed in our report, "The Rule of Two After the Executive Orders," the enforceability of this for larger contracts is now under direct threat due to the FAR Overhaul and the dismantling of key market research triggers.
• The Kingdomware Decision: The U.S. Supreme Court, in Kingdomware Technologies, Inc. v. United States (2016), unanimously affirmed the mandatory nature of the Rule of Two in the context of Department of Veterans Affairs contracting, reinforcing that it is not discretionary when the conditions are met.

Key Set-Aside Programs – Dedicated Pathways to Opportunity

Beyond the general Rule of Two, Congress has established several specific set-aside programs to address documented disparities and ensure that various categories of small businesses have access to federal contracting. These programs are not 'preferences' but are structural tools designed to level the playing field and broaden participation in the federal marketplace. Key programs include:

• 8(a) Business Development Program: Assists small businesses owned and controlled by socially and economically disadvantaged individuals.
• Women-Owned Small Business (WOSB) Program: Aims to provide equal access to federal contracting for women entrepreneurs who still face systemic barriers.
• Service-Disabled Veteran-Owned Small Business (SDVOSB) Program: Recognizes the unique challenges faced by veterans with service-connected disabilities and provides them with targeted contracting assistance.
• Historically Underutilized Business Zones (HUBZone) Program: Designed to drive investment and job creation into economically distressed communities.

Why These Protections Are Not Optional – A Bipartisan Legacy of Law

It's crucial to understand that these small business protections are not recent political initiatives or optional guidelines; they are firmly rooted in over 70 years of bipartisan federal law and consistent Congressional support. From the original Small Business Act of 1953 through numerous reauthorizations and enhancements signed by presidents of both parties, the commitment to small business participation has been a unifying principle. The legal framework, including the Small Business Act and its implementing regulations in the FAR (like Part 19), creates binding obligations on federal agencies. The current attempts to bypass these established laws and regulations via class deviations and an opaque FAR overhaul process represent a direct challenge to this long-standing legal and policy consensus.